Protecting Serbia’s sovereignty in football

I love the dedication from patriotic Serbian football supporters. For them there is no surrender when it comes to protecting Serbia’s territorial integrity. That is why we hear them chant Kosovo je srce Srbije, Kosovo is the hear of Serbia, carrying their Nema predaje, no surrender flags.

On Wednesday, Belgrade Red Star can take the last step to compete again in the UEFA Champion’s League, but first they have to defeat Bodø/ Glimt, the best football team in Norway. I would of course have wished that my beloved Rosenborg was the best team in Norway, but that is no longer the case. Bodø/ Glimt used to the Rosenborg’s apprentice, but now we have to learn from them.

I understand that most Partizan supporters do not want Red Star to succeed in the Champion’s League, but when it comes to Bodø/ Glimt, I have no bad feelings about them. When it comes to Serbian teams in sports, I support them, as long as they do not play against Rosenborg 🙂

On Wednesday I will be in Marakana in solidarity with the courageous Serbian Delije supporters wearing my Nema predaje shirt and carrying my Nema predaje flag, but media in Norway have a different view. They are upset that Serbian supporters support Kosovo and Metohija on Bodø/ Glimts home ground Aspmyra. We can see this in the article from the Norwegian public broadcaster NRK, the equivalent of the Serbian RTS or the British BBC: Scandal flag on Aspmyra: – Don’t understand why they do it.

Here we see that the well-known Norwegian linguist Svein Mønnesland, a man who speaks good Serbian do not understand why football supporters support Serbia, but this is very simple.

They support the national policy of Serbia, supported by President Aleksandar Vučić and the overwhelming majority of Serbian politicians and the majority of countries in the world that do not recognize the regime in Priština as an independent country. That this should be controversial and a mystery to a knowledgeable man like Mønnesland is simply a mystery.

My background is that Norway sent me to Kosovo and Metohija in January 2000 to be a spokesman for KFOR, NATO’s peacekeeping force in the Serbian province. I know all the arguments of the NATO globalists backwards and blindfolded, with the alleged need for humanitarian intervention, R2P, responsibility to protect, the military technical agreement MTA, and UN Security Council Resolution 1244, which became a much better agreement than what was presented at the dictate in Rambouillet.

According to Rambouillet negotiations, Yugoslavia had to give up sovereignty over land, sea and air, without criminal liability or compensation, according to the NATO proposed Status of forces agreement. In addition, Yugoslavia had to agree to a referendum on the province’s future, but only in Kosovo and Metohija, not all of Yugoslavia.

According to UNSCR 1244, Kosovo and Metohija is part of Serbia, and this is also the reason why we see Nema predaje in several contexts. Thus, this is a response to the fact that Norway has recognized the Priština regime as an independent country.

Five years before he died, I had the honor of sitting with Thorvald Stoltenberg, famous as the peace negotiator in Bosnia and father of Jens Stoltenberg, in his apartment in Mogens Thorsens gate 1 in Oslo, and we talked about NATO’s aggression against Yugoslavia. Hear our conversation on SoundCloud if you understand Norwegian. He told me that no independent country would have accepted the dictates presented at Rambouillet, and in many ways we can say that Yugoslavia won the war over NATO because the conditions in 1244 were so much better than what was foreshadowed at Rambouillet.

When I’m on Serbian national TV these days, I actively warn against Serbia joining NATO, EU and other anti-democratic institutions, while I encourage them to show the West that there is no surrenter when it comes to Kosovo and Metohija. I haven’t fully planned how to do TV interviews on Wednesday, but I expect to say something on Serbian TV. I will of course I will be available for Norwegian and Serbian media.

When Norwegian football actively promotes such a polarizing and radical political flag as pride, which represents a radically new understanding of gender identity, parenthood and children’s right to know both their mother and their father, it would only be missing if Serbian football supporters were not allowed to display a flag which supports Serbia’s national sovereignty.

PS: While I have no negative feelings about Bodø/ Glimt, I do not wish Molde any victories. See this video when I was helping Partizan supporters to sing against Molde 🙂

Comments are closed.